The basis of my dispute with Barry Carson of Carson Marine was:

​

1.Carson’s narcissistic, coercive and corrosive behavior;

​

2.Carson’s unprovoked, defamatory and derogatory comments about Probond Marine to our customers, suppliers, stakeholders and strategic partners; and

​

3.Carson’s repudiatory breaches of our contractual relationship.

 

All of which, resulted in Probond Marine being forced to take High Court action against Barry Carson of Carson Marine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Continued from #1 above:

Barry Carson reputation is infamous across the marine industry.

In his caustic wake are a series of litigations and documented failed associations, joint-ventures and partnerships with companies such as; Hoyle Marine Limited, Skua RIBs, Probond Marine Limited and Meercat Workboats………..   

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Continued from #2 above:

 

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

​

​

​

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Continued from #3 above:

Outlined below is the Agreement that pertains to the intellectual property rights associated with the Interceptor design. This Agreement was drafted by Barry Carson of Carson Marine and clause #8 clearly states that Probond Marine purchased and owns those intellectual property rights. In addition, clause #14 clearly states that the use of the Carson brand name is discretionary.

​